Today in class, all of us shared what we selected for our analysis articles. It was actually fascinating to see what our classmates selected to do their article on. We bought to debate our articles with our group and then with the class. It was really attention-grabbing to get to find out about the entire different articles and the way they pertain to science. This exercise showed that science is about all totally different matters and it doesn’t just deal with only one specific factor.
The process started by identifying the government-run or funded research organizations that printed the best number of articles in scholarly journals from 2008 to 2013, as listed in the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. The list was cross-referenced against the number of patents filed by every group throughout the same time period within the Derwent World Patents Index and the Derwent Innovations Index. Patent equivalents, citing patents and citing articles were included as much as July 2015. The timeframe allows for the articles and patent activity to receive citations, thereby contributing to that portion of the methodology.
The indicators were used to rank every of the universities and the composite rating was achieved by summing the ranks for every criterion for every university. Each indicator was weighted equally except for Patent Citation Impact and Percent of Patents Cited, which obtained 50 {77460cc62ec56551cc1dbfb503f411e3d41c1b7c4a3cf350cd32d10a76f2ef4a} weighting each since they are carefully related in measuring the same phenomenon. If two or more universities tied of their last score, then the variety of Patent Citations was used to separate them, since that indicator is carefully related to demonstrating the persevering with utility of an invention or process.
The indicators have been used to rank each group and the composite rating was achieved by summing up the ranks for every space for every organization. Each indicator was weighted equally except Patent Citation Impact and Percent of Patents Cited, which acquired 50 percent weighting every since they’re carefully associated in measuring the identical phenomenon. When two establishments had the same composite rating, the tie was broken in favor of the organization with essentially the most Patent Citations, since that indicator is closely associated to demonstrating the continuing utility of an invention or process.
The checklist was lowered to simply those establishments that filed 70 or more World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patents. Each candidate organization was then evaluated utilizing varied indicators together with how often its patent purposes were granted, how many patents were filed with world patent workplaces and local authorities and the way often the group’s patents were cited by others. They had been also evaluated by way of how often their analysis papers were cited by patents and the share of articles that featured a co-author from trade.