Generally speaking, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN presents concepts that have already been printed within the peer-reviewed technical literature. We don’t publish new theories or results of authentic research.
There’s some evidence that the approach may be an effective one. Researchers at Yale not too long ago found that the more scientifically curious” (as opposed to just knowledgeable) people are, the less doubtless they’re to hold polarized beliefs about science and the more doubtless they are to be open to new information. (As their science curiosity goes up, the polarizing results of upper science comprehension dissipate, and other people transfer the identical course on contentious policies like climate change and fracking,” researcher Dan Kahan mentioned.) It supports the concept that appealing to readers’ curiosity can be a simpler technique to change their minds than just attempting to convince them that they are flawed.
Our expedition social gathering had finally arrived on the location …